Introduction
This blog post explains how we can optimise the response of an LLM AI by describing a generic company-structure using Transactional Analysis psychoanalysis theory.
The method presented assumes familiarity with the basic concepts of Transactional Analysis and the following ideas presented in previous posts:
Basic Transactional Analysis Theory
According to Transactional Analysis theory, the healthy human psyche can be subdivided into three areas of activity, or “ego states”:
- The Adult Ego-State: This area of the mind is the centre of logical processing.
- The Parent Ego-State: This area of the mind is the centre of long-term plans, controls and ethical values.
- The Child Ego-State: This area of the mind is the centre of spontaneity, feeling (joy and sadness), intimacy, creativity and energy.
This simple model of the human psyche can be further expanded on and analysed to better understand the complexities of human behaviour.
Ego State Specialisation
High-performing people often specialise in a specific ego state, for example:
- Specialised Adult Ego-State: A brilliant chess player may specialise in the Adult ego state; this allows them to develop highly sophisticated patterns of logical thought, strategy, and analysis.
- Specialised Parent Ego-State: An effective teacher may specialise in the Parent ego state; this allows them to develop a deeply intuitive rapport with the children in their care, identify the needs of the child, and provide the appropriate and relevant education.
- Specialised Child Ego-State: A good artist may specialise in the Child ego state; this allows them to develop a better-than-normal appreciation for beauty, subtlety, and the delicate nuances of the human condition.
In Transactional Analysis terminology, ego state specialisation is sometimes referred to as a Constant Ego State. That terminology is used in the rest of this blog post for convenience, although specialising in an ego state does not necessarily mean that the person is always “in” that ego state.
High Performing Teams
From a Transactional Analysis perspective, high performing teams often consist at their core of three essential actors:
- One of whom specialises in the Adult Ego-State – i.e. who provides the level of analysis and coherent thought needed to guide the team.
- One of whom specialises in the Parent Ego-State – i.e. who provides the long term planning and “controls” needed to control and maximise the team’s resources.
- One of whom specialises in the Child Ego-State – i.e. who provides the dynamism, the detail and the verve needed to energise the team. (This person is also often the “doer”.)
Each core team member “donates” the ego-state in which they specialise to the team. This allows the creation of a “macro team-psyche” that mirrors the Parent-Adult-Child structure of the individual human psyche.
For further discussion of these ideas, see the previous posts: |
Company Structure In Transactional Analysis
In addition to identifying the Parent-Adult-Child ego-state structure in high-performing teams, it is also often possible to identify this psychological structure in the the company structure of Upper Management, Middle Management and the Workforce.
- Upper Management – often assumes the role of the Parent (Controlling, development of high-level plans and direction).
- Middle Management – often assumes the role of the Adult (Logical – how will the plans of Upper Management be effected via the Workforce).
- Workforce – often assumes the role of the Child (Applies emotional energy to “get the job done”. Additionally is often detail-oriented and emotionally involved in the “work”.)
Simply put, Senior Management often communicates to the Workforce in a parental tone, and tasks Middle Management with organising resources in a way that allows the work they have dictated to “get done”.
The Organisation Ego-State Matrix
Combining the ideas presented above, leads to the matrix organisational ego-state structure represented in the following diagram:
In this diagram:
- A high-performing Parent-Adult-Child team is present at both the Senior Management and the Workforce levels.
- Communication between the different levels of management is facilitated by the “central player” (being the Adult), at all company levels.
- Only a single employee is shown at the Middle Management level, since Middle Management is often seen as a luxury more than a necessity, and tends to be under (rather than over) staffed.
According to the layout presented in the diagram, it is the Adult at each level of the company, that facilitates intra-company-level communication. This does not take into account the observation above that instructions from Senior Management to Middle Management to the Workforce, often follows a Parent -> Adult -> Child train of communication.
In order to allow for both these points of view (that the central player at each company level occupies the Adult ego state, but that in intra-company communication, the Adult at the Senior Management level assumes the role of Parent and the Adult at the Workforce level assumes the role of Child), we have to introduce the Transactional Analysis idea of cathexis, which means that an individual can consciously “move ” (cathect) from one ego state to the other.
This means to say that:
- When the Senior Management Adult communicates with the rest of the company, that person cathects into the Parent.
- When the Workforce Adult communicates with management, that person cathects into the Child.
The effects of this “cathexis” are shown in the following modified diagram:
In summary, the Transactional Analysis idea of cathexis allows us to represent both:
- the Parent-Adult-Child team enhancing structure at each company level, and also
- the Parent-Adult-Child intra-company communication structure
that occurs between management and the workforce.
Simulating Ego-State Based Company Communication Using AI
The advantage of being able to define the structure of a company in an entirely generic manner is that we can then configure an AI to be able to provide a realistic response without being pre-configured for the relevant field of activity. The following examples show how we can apply the above-described psychological company-model to two very different business scenarios.
Print and Mail Job Workflow
Let’s see what happens if we ask ChatGPT (o1 preview) to simulate the workflow in a company needed to process a print-and-mail job in a direct mail company, based on the above psychological company structure (shared chat):
You said:
Let’s say that from a Transactional Analysis perspective, the way communication works within an organisation is as follows:
- At each level (senior management, middle management, and the actual workforce), efficient work units are comprised of combinations of one Constant Adult (provides accurate analysis), one Constant Parent (provides controls and direction), and one Constant Child (provides “energy”, actuation, precision and detail).
- In addition to these horizontal ego-state combinations, a vertical ego-state combination combines the three management layers, in which the Constant Adult at the worker level becomes Constant Child (since practically speaking, the worker level provides the actual organisation actuation), the Constant Adult at the middle management level remains Constant Adult (and thus serves as the organisational psychological logic lynchpin), and the Constant Adult at the senior management level becomes the Constant Parent (since practically speaking, senior management provides control and direction).
Provide a worked example of how a work request could come into an organisation and “hit” the middle-management level (e.g. a request for a print and mail job in a direct mail company), and then be fanned out effectively throughout the organisation and be acted on, using the channels of ego state connection and communication described above.
Nomenclature
The following shorthand nomenclature is assumed by ChatGPT in its responses:
|
(Also needed to provide some further guidance to clarify this theory, see the shared chat for details.)
ChatGPTIntroduction In this scenario, we’ll detail how a work request is communicated through an organization using Transactional Analysis (TA) principles. The organization consists of seven individuals:
Within each level, the Constant Adult acts as the central communicator, receiving external messages and coordinating internal communication. Scenario: Processing a Print and Mail Job Request Step 1: External Message Received by Senior Management Adult (Sₐ)
Step 2: Senior Adult Communicates Internally
Step 3: Senior Adult Communicates with Middle Management Adult (Mₐ)
Step 4: Middle Management Adult Processes the Request
Step 5: Middle Management Adult Communicates with Worker Level Adult (Wₐ)
Step 6: Worker Adult Communicates Internally
Step 7: Execution of the Work
Step 8: Worker Adult Reports Back to Middle Management Adult
Step 9: Middle Management Adult Updates Senior Management Adult
Step 10: Senior Adult Communicates Internally and with the Client
Step 11: Project Completion and Final Communication
Communication Flow Summary with Actual Dialogues
Roles and Responsibilities with Actual Communication
Conclusion By detailing the actual communications between each individual, we see how the work request flows through the organization:
This comprehensive communication framework ensures that the project is completed successfully, with each ego state contributing its strengths to the organization’s operations. |
Interestingly, based on the very generic ego-state company description, ChatGPT has created a very compelling narrative of company workflow that includes:
- The relevant skill-sets needed to process the requested work item.
- Interactions with the end customer.
- Interactions within the company needed to action the requested work item.
Considerations for Developing a new SaaS Product
Using the same company psychological structure, let’s simulate a discussion concerning the top 10 things to consider when a disaster-recovery software company is developing a new SaaS product.
ChatGPT
|